top of page

Supreme Court
vs. CONSTITUTION

What the Constitution REALLY Says About Taxes

Do 230 Years of Supreme Court Tax Doctrine Rest on An Unfounded Assumption?

This book shows:

​

1. The year the Supreme Court went off its constitutional rails—when one justice claimed that the Constitution provides for “indirect taxes.” It does not.

​

2. How the historical evidence—including from the Constitution itself—shows no textual support for that assumption.

​

3. How that unfounded  assumption became “settled doctrine” by repetition - without ever being  examined.

​

4. How  that calls into question the Court’s later view of the post–Sixteenth Amendment income tax.

​

5. What you, individually, can do about it, today.

​

Secure checkout. Complete PDF delivered by email.

Supreme Court vs. CONSTITUTION - Wrong on Taxes for 230 Years

Alex,

Outstanding content, well written, and easy to read. An impressive effort. Well done. 

(BTW, I was glad to see your rebuttal to the misinformation that the USA is a “corporation.”)

Thx for sharing it with me.

 

Russell B., Houston, TX

Founder, Eliminate Property Tax (FB)

In Supreme Court vs. Constitution, Alex Wallenwein raises a fascinating constitutional question that I had never considered before. He explains his argument in a way that is easy to follow and gives the reader plenty to think about. Whether or not you agree with every conclusion, it is clear that a great deal of research, thought and effort went into this book.

​

Greg Stuessel, Sealy, TX

bottom of page