top of page

Supreme Court
vs. CONSTITUTION

What the Constitution REALLY Says About Taxes

Do 230 Years of Supreme Court Tax Doctrine Rest on An Unfounded Assumption?

This book shows:

1. The year the Supreme Court went off its constitutional rails—when one justice claimed that the Constitution provides for “indirect taxes.” It does not.

2. How the historical evidence—including from the Constitution itself—shows no textual support for that assumption.

3. How that unfounded  assumption became “settled doctrine” by repetition - without ever being  examined.

4. How  that calls into question the Court’s later view of the post–Sixteenth Amendment income tax.

5. What you, individually, can do about it, today.

Secure checkout. Complete PDF delivered by email.

Supreme Court vs. CONSTITUTION - Wrong on Taxes for 230 Years

Alex,

Outstanding content, well written, and easy to read. An impressive effort. Well done. 

(BTW, I was glad to see your rebuttal to the misinformation that the USA is a “corporation.”)

Thx for sharing it with me.

 

Russell B., Houston, TX

Founder, Eliminate Property Tax (FB)

In Supreme Court vs. Constitution, Alex Wallenwein raises a fascinating constitutional question that I had never considered before. He explains his argument in a way that is easy to follow and gives the reader plenty to think about. Whether or not you agree with every conclusion, it is clear that a great deal of research, thought and effort went into this book.

Greg Stuessel, Sealy, TX

bottom of page